Freedom of Religion: Are the minorties the only ones affected?

The Tamil Nadu leftist government disallowed Hindu devotees from lighting a lamp and practicing their rituals despite a High Court order. Similarly, the Kerala leftist government robbed Sabarimala.

All these incidents point to the need for a Hindu Temples Act and a Hindu Temple Foundation to protect the rights of Hindu devotees across Bharat. Why should regional governments control Hindus when they do not impose such controls on the Waqf or Christian boards? In which country can minorities deny the majority the right to practice their faith or worship their God?

 

There's no Freedom of Religion in any Muslim country. Many Middle Eastern countries ban the Gita and the Bible. In Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, conversion from Islam to another faith attracts the death penalty. In their Islamic dictatorships, foreigners can't become citizens. No minority member can own land or become a billionaire. People are forced to obey the Shariat, but there is no outrage in America against it. 

 

Islamic rulers have destroyed countless Temples, Churches, and Worship places of other communities, and changed them to Mosques. Now, their terrorists are doing it in Africa. But if one Babri becomes Ram Mandir (which it originally was), there's outrage. If Hindus did half of the atrocities of Aurangzeb, all Muslims would become Jihadis. That's their endurance and tolerance level. 

 

Bharat has survived the rule of Islamic and British rulers, including Aurangzeb. We cannot become their slaves again, nor be denied equal and fair treatment because of special privileges and reservations given to Muslims by certain parties. All Hindus must do the votebank politics back to them, by voting as one unit for the Bharatiya Janata Party. Remember, it is Bharatiya, not a Hindu Janata Party, unlike their Muslim League.