Like Sheep Led to a Slaughterhouse: The Deceived Hindu Voter of Kozhikode South

Like sheep led to slaughter houses (left and right) are Kozhikode's Hindu and Christian Voters. We have nothing to do with Jinnah’s Muslim Leagues' (IUML and INL) agendas of Islamic Sovereignty (Shariat) or Safety (Khairiyat). Then, why should our Gandhian Congress and Marxian Communist leaders lead us to vote for Jinnah's Islamic State ideology that we dislike, reject, and sometimes hate? Why don't the secular UDF and LDF field proper Congress or Communist candidates instead of indulging in Communal Politics in broad daylight? Why do they mislead us to vote for an ideology we have no allegiance to?

 

The scenario: Kozhikode South Total Voters: 1,50,000+, Hindu population: 60 percent (90,000). Still, out of the four candidates, three are Muslim candidates from Muslim communal parties, and not secular parties. The Communist parties (CPI or CPM) have no candidate. The Congress party has no candidate. The UDF is fielding IUML (Muslim League), and the LDF fields INL (Muslim League). All these parties are confident that in a sixty percent Hindu area, no Hindu candidate can win. Why? Because they know Muslims will vote in a lump sum, and those who get their vote share might win. Take a look at this classic example of vote bank politics.

 

In 2021, in Kozhikode South, the INL Muslim candidate received 50,000+ votes, while the IUML Muslim candidate received 40,000 votes. The Hindu candidate of the BJP got only 24,000 votes, mostly Hindus. She lost. Let us ponder: how can a community that is less than 40% of the total population field two candidates from both fronts in Kerala? It is because Hindus never vote along religious or communal lines, whereas Muslims almost always vote along communal lines. The political fronts know that many Hindus will vote for LDF or UDF based on their left or right-wing ideology, and the Hindu vote share would get divided.

 

In this election as well, both the main parties, LDF and UDF, namely CPM and Congress, do not have a candidate to field in Kozhikode city under their symbol. Two pseudo-secular Muslim parties (INL and IUML) are fielding two Muslim candidates. Whoever wins, LDF or UDF, a Muslim MLA would be the result. It happens because almost all voters in the minority Muslim community vote communally. Though in the last five years, none of the INL or IUML candidates have done anything good for the city, except for their own minority community, many Hindus may still vote for their ideological parties without examining who they are actually voting for.

 

These misdirected Hindu voters are not voting for a Gandhian Congress UDF, nor are they voting for a Marxian Communist LDF. Instead, they are blackmailed by their respective fronts, blinded by the desire to win elections, and tricked by their political leaders to vote for a Muhammadan Shariat League candidate. These Hindus hardly notice the Jinnah link unless someone points it out. This is classic votebank politics. The voter is eager to win for his left or right-wing ideology, but in reality, he elects a Pseudo-left or Pseudo-right Jinnah League. It is unfair, and does not justly reflect the real voice of the sixty percent Hindu voters: right or left.

 

However, if Hindus vote only for a Hindu candidate, this phenomenon will not repeat. Therefore, let's do a Reverse Votebank now. Let's break this unholy chain of Jinnah leagues and choose Modiji’s candidate, T. Raneesh, to defeat vote-bank politics. All Hindus must make their votes count and vote only for the BJP. We should not allow this level of hypocritical votebank communal politics where the opponents use Jinnah League parties and their terrorist friends to demean all those who vote for an ideology, left or right. We can't let our country be taken over by Jinnah's children through political invasion using Socialist and Communist coalitions.

 

In Kozhikode South, Nehru (INC) has no candidate. Marx (CPIM) has no candidate. The Muslim League of Jinnah has two candidates: one from the LDF (INL) and the other from the UDF (IUML). Islamic Communal Politicians are fooling us. They betray our nation into the hands of Shabaz Sharif's Muslim League's ISI-sponsored terror network. Why should our Indian soldiers die to safeguard the Muslim League's double game: yaahan bhi aur vahan bhi? By Yahan, I mean in India, and by Vahan, I mean in Pakistan. The story seems to go as follows.

 

Pakistan’s Jinnah Muslim League prepares terrorists and sends them to India to kill our people. The naive Hindu voter thinks that Jinnah’s Muslim leagues (INL left or IUML right) of the Indi-Alliance will safeguard his life and family from the Pakistani Muslim League terrorists. The only purpose of the Muslim league here and there is Shariat (Dominance) or Kheriat (Safety) of the Islamic community. Back in Pakistan, they give no minority rights to the Hindu communities. However, here in Hindustan, they get minority rights for their community.

 

Besides, if they win a minister’s or MLA’s post in Keralam, it is icing on the cake. The irony is that Jinnah’s Muslim League has convinced both Nehru’s UDF and Marx’s LDF to field Jinnah’s League candidates. Nehru’s principal opponent during India’s division into Pakistan and Bharat was Jinnah. Jinnah demanded Pakistan and got it. Now, Jinnah’s descendants demand Nehru’s grandson to provide them with MLAs and MPs within Hindustan. To make certain that only a Jinnah would succeed, these hypocrites convince the Marxists to field league candidates.

 

To sum up, despite being less than 40% of the population, the Muslim community fields two candidates from both fronts because Hindus split their votes between UDF and LDF based on ideology, not community. This vote division benefits the communal parties. Hindus, seeking to win for their ideology, are led to support Jinnah’s Muslim League parties without realizing it. This is classic vote bank politics, and does not reflect the true intent of sixty percent Hindu voters. If Hindus vote together for a Hindu candidate, this cycle can end.

 

Only fair representation and equal consideration of all communities uphold democratic values. Therefore, we must choose Modiji's vision of development with peace and inclusivity, and without tolerance for corruption, terrorism, or drug abuse. If we do not subscribe to Jinnah’s Pakistan banao Pakistan bachao ideology, we do not need to vote for the Jinnah wolves in Nehru’s clothing. To defeat vote-bank politics, vote for the BJP and make each vote count. Don’t let political coalitions undermine ideological representation. Let us elect our NDA candidates, T. Raneesh and Navya Haridas, before it is too late for us to take our city back.